Daily Mail - Revision history

Duyel: /* Other websites */

2024-12-31T06:09:47Z

Other websites

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 31 December 2024
Line 16:		Line 16:

	== Other websites ==		== Other websites ==
			[[bn:ডেইলি মেইল]]

Protik Sikder at 03:03, 31 December 2024

2024-12-31T03:03:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 31 December 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{SHORTDESC: British Tabloid Newspaper}}
	The '''''Daily Mail''''' is a large, well-known [[newspaper]]. It started in 1896. It is published every weekday and Saturday from a [[factory]] in [[London]], [[England]]. It is not printed on Sundays. Its sister paper, the ''Mail on Sunday'', is printed instead.		The '''''Daily Mail''''' is a large, well-known [[newspaper]]. It started in 1896. It is published every weekday and Saturday from a [[factory]] in [[London]], [[England]]. It is not printed on Sundays. Its sister paper, the ''Mail on Sunday'', is printed instead.

Protik Sikder at 03:02, 31 December 2024

2024-12-31T03:02:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:02, 31 December 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is the main publication of the [[Daily Mail and General Trust]], but the company also prints the ''[[Evening Standard]]'', ''[[London Lite]]'' and ''[[Metro]]'' newspapers in the UK.		It is the main publication of the [[Daily Mail and General Trust]], but the company also prints the ''[[Evening Standard]]'', ''[[London Lite]]'' and ''[[Metro]]'' newspapers in the UK.

	People are often critical of The ''Daily Mail, ''because a lot of people think it's [[Racism\|racist]] and [[Sexism\|sexist]].<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://www.skepticink.com/tippling/2014/03/23/proof-again-that-the-daily-mail-is-a-racist-sexist-bigoted-diatribe/\|title=Proof (again) that the Daily Mail is a Racist, Sexist, Bigoted Diatribe • A Tippling Philosopher\|first=Jonathan MS\|last=Pearce\|date=23 March 2014}}</ref> Sources also state that it is unreliable and that it publishes inaccurate scare stories about science and medical research.<ref ~~name="Mail Supremacy"~~>{{cite ~~magazine~~\|last1=Collins\|first1=Lauren\|title=Mail Supremacy\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/02/mail-supremacy\|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]\|date=April 2012~~\|access-date=12 January 2016\|archive-date=17 May 2016\|archive-url=https://archive.today/20160517084209/http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/02/mail-supremacy\|url-status=live~~}}</ref><ref ~~name="The Guardian"~~>{{cite ~~news~~ \|last1=Jackson \|first1=Jasper \|title=Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source \|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website \|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] \|date=9 February 2017 \|access-date=11 February 2017 \|archive-date=8 February 2017 \|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170208211856/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website \|url-status=live }}</ref><ref ~~name="Bad science"~~>{{cite ~~book~~\|last1=Goldacre\|first1=Ben\|title=Bad science\|url=https://archive.org/details/badscience0000gold_g8b4\|date=2008\|publisher=Fourth Estate\|location=London\|isbn=9780007240197}}</ref>		People are often critical of The ''Daily Mail, ''because a lot of people think it's [[Racism\|racist]] and [[Sexism\|sexist]].<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://www.skepticink.com/tippling/2014/03/23/proof-again-that-the-daily-mail-is-a-racist-sexist-bigoted-diatribe/\|title=Proof (again) that the Daily Mail is a Racist, Sexist, Bigoted Diatribe • A Tippling Philosopher\|first=Jonathan MS\|last=Pearce\|date=23 March 2014}}</ref> Sources also state that it is unreliable and that it publishes inaccurate scare stories about science and medical research.<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Collins\|first1=Lauren\|title=Mail Supremacy\|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/02/mail-supremacy\|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]\|date=April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web \|last1=Jackson \|first1=Jasper \|title=Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source \|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website \|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web\|last1=Goldacre\|first1=Ben\|title=Bad science\|url=https://archive.org/details/badscience0000gold_g8b4\|date=2008\|publisher=Fourth Estate\|location=London\|isbn=9780007240197}}</ref>

	Politically the Daily Mail is [[Right-wing politics\|right-wing]].<ref name="Gaber">{{cite journal\|first1=Ivor\|last1=Gaber\|title=The 'Othering' of 'Red Ed', or How the Daily Mail 'Framed' the British Labour Leader\|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-923X.12114\|journal=The Political Quarterly\|year=2014\|issn=1467-923X\|pages=471–479\|volume=85\|issue=4\|doi=10.1111/1467-923X.12114\|access-date=12 November 2020\|archive-date=12 November 2020\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112185326/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-923X.12114\|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Stoegner">{{cite journal\|first1=Karin\|last1=Stoegner\|first2=Ruth\|last2=Wodak\|title='The man who hated Britain' – the discursive construction of 'national unity' in the Daily Mail\|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1103764\|journal=Critical Discourse Studies\|date=14 March 2016\|issn=1740-5904\|pages=193–209\|volume=13\|issue=2\|doi=10.1080/17405904.2015.1103764\|s2cid=147469921}}</ref><ref name="Meyer">{{cite journal\|first1=Anneke\|last1=Meyer\|title=Too Drunk To Say No\|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770903457071\|journal=Feminist Media Studies\|date=1 March 2010\|issn=1468-0777\|pages=19–34\|volume=10\|issue=1\|doi=10.1080/14680770903457071\|s2cid=142036919\|access-date=12 November 2020\|archive-date=17 February 2022\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220217075456/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680770903457071\|url-status=live}}</ref> It has endorsed the [[Conservative Party (UK)\|Conservative Party]] at every UK general election since 1945, apart from the October 1974 general election, where it endorsed a Liberal and Conservative coalition.<ref>{{cite news \|date= 4 May 2010 \|title= Newspaper support in UK general elections \|url= https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support \|work= The Guardian \|access-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-date= 1 August 2013 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130801141949/http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support \|url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news \|last= Martinson \|first= Jane \|date= 6 May 2015 \|title= The Sun serves Ed Miliband a last helping of abuse \|url= https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/06/sun-ed-miliband-labour-mail-telegraph-election \|work= The Guardian \|access-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211122163339/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/06/sun-ed-miliband-labour-mail-telegraph-election \|url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news \|last= McKee \|first= Ruth \|date= 3 June 2017 \|title= Which parties are the UK press backing in the general election? \|url= https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/03/which-parties-are-the-uk-press-backing-in-the-general-election \|work= The Guardian \|access-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-date= 16 November 2021 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211116190123/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/03/which-parties-are-the-uk-press-backing-in-the-general-election \|url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news \|last= Mayhew \|first= Freddy \|date= 9 December 2019 \|title= What the papers say about the 2019 general election \|url= https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/what-the-papers-say-about-the-2019-general-election/ \|work= Press Gazette \|access-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-date= 22 November 2021 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211122163341/https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/what-the-papers-say-about-the-2019-general-election/ \|url-status= live }}</ref>		Politically the Daily Mail is [[Right-wing politics\|right-wing]].It has endorsed the [[Conservative Party (UK)\|Conservative Party]] at every UK general election since 1945, apart from the October 1974 general election, where it endorsed a Liberal and Conservative coalition.

	The ''Daily Mail'' was first published by Lord Northclife in 1896. It started as a broadsheet. It is now a [[tabloid]].<ref>{{cite ~~news~~ \|title=London Daily Mail goes compact \|first=Robert \|last=Nelson \|url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/access/263913472.html?dids=263913472:263913472&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=May+05%2C+1971&author=By+Robert+Nelson+Staff+correspondent+of+The+Christian+Science+Monitor&pub=Christian+Science+Monitor&desc=London+Daily+Mail+goes+compact \|newspaper=The Christian Science Monitor \|location=Boston, Massachusetts \|date=5 May 1971 \|access-date=24 January 2011 \|archive-date=18 June 2012 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120618234319/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/access/263913472.html?dids=263913472:263913472&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=May+05%2C+1971&author=By+Robert+Nelson+Staff+correspondent+of+The+Christian+Science+Monitor&pub=Christian+Science+Monitor&desc=London+Daily+Mail+goes+compact \|url-status=dead }}</ref>		The ''Daily Mail'' was first published by Lord Northclife in 1896. It started as a broadsheet. It is now a [[tabloid]].<ref>{{cite web \|title=London Daily Mail goes compact \|first=Robert \|last=Nelson \|url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/access/263913472.html?dids=263913472:263913472&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=May+05%2C+1971&author=By+Robert+Nelson+Staff+correspondent+of+The+Christian+Science+Monitor&pub=Christian+Science+Monitor&desc=London+Daily+Mail+goes+compact \|newspaper=The Christian Science Monitor \|location=Boston, Massachusetts \|date=5 May 1971 }}</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Protik Sikder: Created page with "The '''''Daily Mail''''' is a large, well-known newspaper. It started in 1896. It is published every weekday and Saturday from a factory in London, England. It is not printed on Sundays. Its sister paper, the ''Mail on Sunday'', is printed instead. It is the second-most sold newspaper in the United Kingdom. It sells more than a million copies a day. Its political opinion is right-wing, and it supports the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]..."

2024-12-31T02:58:08Z

Created page with "The '''''Daily Mail''''' is a large, well-known newspaper. It started in 1896. It is published every weekday and Saturday from a factory in London, England. It is not printed on Sundays. Its sister paper, the ''Mail on Sunday'', is printed instead. It is the second-most sold newspaper in the United Kingdom. It sells more than a million copies a day. Its political opinion is right-wing, and it supports the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]..."

New page

The '''''Daily Mail''''' is a large, well-known [[newspaper]]. It started in 1896. It is published every weekday and Saturday from a [[factory]] in [[London]], [[England]]. It is not printed on Sundays. Its sister paper, the ''Mail on Sunday'', is printed instead.

It is the second-most sold newspaper in the United Kingdom. It sells more than a million copies a day. Its political opinion is [[right-wing]], and it supports the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] in elections. The newspaper is available in many countries outside the United Kingdom, such as [[Egypt]] and the [[US]]. There is a different Scottish edition of the newspaper, which is sold in [[Scotland]] only and differs mainly in the [[Sport]] pages. There is also an [[Ireland|Irish]] version of the newspaper, but the main international version is the English one.

It is the main publication of the [[Daily Mail and General Trust]], but the company also prints the ''[[Evening Standard]]'', ''[[London Lite]]'' and ''[[Metro]]'' newspapers in the UK.

People are often critical of The ''Daily Mail, ''because a lot of people think it's [[Racism|racist]] and [[Sexism|sexist]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.skepticink.com/tippling/2014/03/23/proof-again-that-the-daily-mail-is-a-racist-sexist-bigoted-diatribe/|title=Proof (again) that the Daily Mail is a Racist, Sexist, Bigoted Diatribe • A Tippling Philosopher|first=Jonathan MS|last=Pearce|date=23 March 2014}}</ref> Sources also state that it is unreliable and that it publishes inaccurate scare stories about science and medical research.<ref name="Mail Supremacy">{{cite magazine|last1=Collins|first1=Lauren|title=Mail Supremacy|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/02/mail-supremacy|magazine=[[The New Yorker]]|date=April 2012|access-date=12 January 2016|archive-date=17 May 2016|archive-url=https://archive.today/20160517084209/http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/02/mail-supremacy|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="The Guardian">{{cite news |last1=Jackson |first1=Jasper |title=Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=9 February 2017 |access-date=11 February 2017 |archive-date=8 February 2017 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20170208211856/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Bad science">{{cite book|last1=Goldacre|first1=Ben|title=Bad science|url=https://archive.org/details/badscience0000gold_g8b4|date=2008|publisher=Fourth Estate|location=London|isbn=9780007240197}}</ref>

Politically the Daily Mail is [[Right-wing politics|right-wing]].<ref name="Gaber">{{cite journal|first1=Ivor|last1=Gaber|title=The 'Othering' of 'Red Ed', or How the Daily Mail 'Framed' the British Labour Leader|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-923X.12114|journal=The Political Quarterly|year=2014|issn=1467-923X|pages=471–479|volume=85|issue=4|doi=10.1111/1467-923X.12114|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=12 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112185326/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-923X.12114|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Stoegner">{{cite journal|first1=Karin|last1=Stoegner|first2=Ruth|last2=Wodak|title='The man who hated Britain' – the discursive construction of 'national unity' in the Daily Mail|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1103764|journal=Critical Discourse Studies|date=14 March 2016|issn=1740-5904|pages=193–209|volume=13|issue=2|doi=10.1080/17405904.2015.1103764|s2cid=147469921}}</ref><ref name="Meyer">{{cite journal|first1=Anneke|last1=Meyer|title=Too Drunk To Say No|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770903457071|journal=Feminist Media Studies|date=1 March 2010|issn=1468-0777|pages=19–34|volume=10|issue=1|doi=10.1080/14680770903457071|s2cid=142036919|access-date=12 November 2020|archive-date=17 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220217075456/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680770903457071|url-status=live}}</ref> It has endorsed the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] at every UK general election since 1945, apart from the October 1974 general election, where it endorsed a Liberal and Conservative coalition.<ref>{{cite news |date= 4 May 2010 |title= Newspaper support in UK general elections |url= https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support |work= The Guardian |access-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-date= 1 August 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130801141949/http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= Martinson |first= Jane |date= 6 May 2015 |title= The Sun serves Ed Miliband a last helping of abuse |url= https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/06/sun-ed-miliband-labour-mail-telegraph-election |work= The Guardian |access-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211122163339/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/06/sun-ed-miliband-labour-mail-telegraph-election |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= McKee |first= Ruth |date= 3 June 2017 |title= Which parties are the UK press backing in the general election? |url= https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/03/which-parties-are-the-uk-press-backing-in-the-general-election |work= The Guardian |access-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-date= 16 November 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211116190123/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/03/which-parties-are-the-uk-press-backing-in-the-general-election |url-status= live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= Mayhew |first= Freddy |date= 9 December 2019 |title= What the papers say about the 2019 general election |url= https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/what-the-papers-say-about-the-2019-general-election/ |work= Press Gazette |access-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211122163341/https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/what-the-papers-say-about-the-2019-general-election/ |url-status= live }}</ref>

The ''Daily Mail'' was first published by Lord Northclife in 1896. It started as a broadsheet. It is now a [[tabloid]].<ref>{{cite news |title=London Daily Mail goes compact |first=Robert |last=Nelson |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/access/263913472.html?dids=263913472:263913472&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=May+05%2C+1971&author=By+Robert+Nelson+Staff+correspondent+of+The+Christian+Science+Monitor&pub=Christian+Science+Monitor&desc=London+Daily+Mail+goes+compact |newspaper=The Christian Science Monitor |location=Boston, Massachusetts |date=5 May 1971 |access-date=24 January 2011 |archive-date=18 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120618234319/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/access/263913472.html?dids=263913472:263913472&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&date=May+05%2C+1971&author=By+Robert+Nelson+Staff+correspondent+of+The+Christian+Science+Monitor&pub=Christian+Science+Monitor&desc=London+Daily+Mail+goes+compact |url-status=dead }}</ref>

==References==
{{Reflist}}

== Other websites ==